I’ve got several topics I’ve been trying to finish a blog post about, but I keep finding myself running around in circles… when I’m not getting lost down fractal rabbit holes.
So tonight I want to just post here this list that I’ve calling:
Gene’s Postulates of Bad Faith Argumentation
The shortest distance between two blowhards is a common enemy.
An argument can be extended into an infinite line of malarky with just the occasional application of a sea lion.
All circular reasoning can be defined by a single point and an iterative diversion.
Every false equivalence is congruent to every line of B.S.
If two persons are having a sincere misapprehension a single troll can cause an infinite number of irrelevant squabbles.
There may eventually be some Axioms and Definition of Elements to go along with this eventually.
1 thought on “Thinking about professional conclusion jumpers”