All posts by fontfolly

Unknown's avatar

About fontfolly

I've loved reading for as long as I can remember. I write fantasy, science fiction, mystery, and nonfiction. For more than 20 years I edited and published an anthropomorphic sci-fi/space opera literary fanzine. I attend and work on the staff for several anthropormorphics, anime, and science fiction conventions. I live near Seattle with my wonderful husband, still completely amazed that he puts up with me at all.

Time Travellers Strictly Cash: more of why I love sf/f

The cover of my very own copy of Callahan's Crosstime Saloon. (Click to embiggen)
The cover of my very own copy of Callahan’s Crosstime Saloon. (Click to embiggen)
When I was in middle school, I pleaded so much for a subscription to the Magazine of Fantasy and Science Fiction that one of my grandparents purchased a subscription to Galaxy Science Fiction. I suspect that they slipped into my room one day and grabbed a copy of whichever magazine I had laying around—at the time my only source of the magazine was a rack in the local drugstore, and some months they got Galaxy, some months SF & F, and other months Analog.

It was in the pages of Galaxy that I first “met” Spider Robinson, who wrote their book review column at the time. The books he reviewed were books that either had just come out in hardback or were going to be coming out soon, so they were never books I would be seeing in a while. If a book wasn’t purchased by the local public library, my only option back then was to happen upon a paperback book when the family took a trip to the larger town (across the state line) where they actually had bookstores!

Even though I often didn’t see the books he reviewed until years later, his book reviews gave me a sense of belonging to the sci fi tribe. And they were just fun to read!

1428973Robinson wrote his own science fiction, too. I believe I read a few of the Callahan’s short stories out of order as they appeared in the magazines. It wasn’t until I was in college when I found a copy of Time Traveler’s Strictly Cash in a used bookstore that I read a bunch of them in order. I immediately became an even bigger Spider Robinson fan.

It’s hard to describe the Callahan’s stories. Most of them are set in a bar that somehow manages to attract aliens, time travelers, and various mythical creatures each lost in different ways. They were sort of like Twilight Zone episodes… except (almost) always uplifting. Originally, the Callahan stories were semi-standalone stories, most of which were published in the magazine Analog Science Fiction. The stories often illustrated the Law of Conservation of Pain and Joy (also known as Callahan’s Law): “Shared pain is lessened; shared joy, increased—thus do we refute entropy.” Robinson wrote the Callahan’s stories as ideas occurred to him, so he didn’t have a grand plan for continuity. So in the later books as he transitioned from short stories to novels things occasionally went off the rails. But even then, the stories had more than enough heart to patch over the plot holes.

He’s also written novels outside of the Callahan’s universe. My particular favorites are Mindkiller and Telempath, though he is probably more famous for the Stardancer series written in collaboration with his wife, Jeanne Robinson. He’s won three Hugo Awards, a Nebula, the John W. Campbell Award, and the Robert A. Heinlein Award for Lifetime Achievement. So I’m not the only one who likes his work.

I read pretty much every single thing he wrote from 1970s, through the 80s, and a bit into the 90s. He kept writing and still is writing. His most recent novel was published in 2008; he’s been reporting off and on about progress on his next novel on his web site, but he’s also been dealing with serious health issues (both his own and in the family), which has slowed him down.

As I said, I kept reading everything he wrote into the 90s. Around 1993 or ’94 I found myself drifting away from Robinson. Some of it was just issues in my life. I finished coming out of the closet, I got divorced, and a lot of family upheaval happened. This is also the time period when, in my opinion, the Callahan stories started going off the rails. I had also come to the conclusion that I just didn’t agree with the philosophy that seemed to underpin every story he wrote: if only people could communicate more clearly, all conflict would cease. So I stopped reading his new material. I would still pull out my old favorites from time to time to re-read.

In 2000, I read a book review by someone else (unfortunately I don’t remember who) of a new Callahan novel, Callahan’s Key. The reviewer mentioned a similar dissatisfaction that had caused him to stop enjoying Robinson’s writing around the same time I had quit. And the review said that this novel captured at least some of the old magic. The reviewer said the new novel was a joy to read.

So I picked it up. And I read it, and it did have a lot of the fun of the earliest stories. It was not, in any way, a rehashing of them, though most of the characters make an appearance (and team up to save the world, literally). It reminded me of why I had loved his writing to begin with.

I think what appeals to me most about Spider is his unabashed enthusiasm for the idea of science fiction itself. That came through in his book reviews, of course, but also in other essays, introductory material he wrote for the short story collections, but also in the stories themselves. I still remember one comment about Dune Messiah, the first sequel to Frank Herbert’s Dune: it had plot holes you could drive a truck through, but you didn’t care, because the rolling grandeur of Herbert’s vision swept you along.

And he was right.

Robinson’s work epitomizes the giddy hope for a better tomorrow that is at the heart of some of the best science fiction. That exuberant expectation of better things to come is what first drew me to the genre. I’m grateful to have had Spider has a guide and companion in my own search of that wonderful tomorrow.

Pot shots from the troll gallery

Copyright Whitney Phillips.
Quote from Whitney Phillips’ excellent essay, “Don’t Feed the Trolls? It’s Not That Simple.”
I was in High School the first time that something I wrote prompted threats of bodily harm. I was a regular contributor to the editorial page of the student newspaper and wrote on a variety of topics—usually political—but the one that pushed my fellow students over the edge was a critique of stagecraft of the music department’s regular concerts. And I was critiquing it as an insider. I played bassoon in the orchestra and symphonic band (and occasionally other instruments as needed), trombone in the jazz band, and sang baritone in the men’s a cappella group (marching band and the pep band never participated in the formal concerts, but I was in those groups, too).

I was tired of playing concerts to a nearly empty theatre. I had recently seen the fall concert of the music department of the other high school across town, and their auditorium was not only packed, they actually charged an admission fee! And their shows were fun.

Anyway, my opinion column did not go over well with some of my fellow music students. But at least none of them felt the need to be anonymous with the threats of maiming and murder.

The first anonymous threats happened when I wrote about abortion and sex education—in the same high school newspaper in the late 70s. And again at community college (and later at university).

But the most vicious, virulent, and disturbing threats came when I started reviewing exhibits in the small free art gallery at the community college. Express an opinion about art, and people completely lose all sense of proportion. Remember that the next time someone tells you that art (or music, or literature, or movies, television, et cetera) doesn’t matter.So, by the time I was active on QueerNet and such in the early 90s, getting homophobic death threats and the like on the internet seemed like old hat.

Anyway, since the whole Sad Puppies thing has happened, I’ve been getting a few more comments here than usual. Okay, sometimes more than a few. Though it isn’t a deluge. Besides having comments set to moderate (a comment doesn’t appear until approved, unless I’ve added the commenter to the whitelist), anonymous commenting is disabled. And the comment system records IP addresses (and alerts you that it will). So the number is high for my blog (since my average is less than one comment per post), but low by typical internet forum standards.

Although many of the comments have been angry, so far none have risen to a vitriolic level. Not being able to post wholly anonymously contributes to that (just the fact that one has to type into multiple fields is probably too much of a hurdle for many troll), I’m sure. I suspect that because there is simply so much being written about this particular topic, and my little blog isn’t exactly drowning in traffic, that there are too many other places for the trolls to go.

Anyone who has ever met me and talked with me for more than a millisecond knows that I do not shy away from debate. And I don’t believe that simply ignoring all trolls is an effective way to deal with the problem of vicious harassment. I’m not ignoring them. I’ve read the comments, and made a determination based on the contents of the comment of whether the person is here to discuss the issue or just wants to yell. I see no reason to approve the latter type of comments and subject any of my readers to an angry tirade that adds nothing to the discussion. I certainly don’t have the time to try to reason with someone who seems bent on nothing more than trying to shout down and insult dissenters.

Make an actual logical or reasonable argument. Indicate that you understand there is more than one side to the issue. Then we can talk.

Hugo Ballot Reviews: Short Stories

1946 Retro Hugo Award Trophy (which were awarded in 1996).
1946 Retro Hugo Award Trophy (which were awarded in 1996). Designed by: Barry Workman, Mike Donahue and Shawn Crosby.
Voting is open for the Hugo Awards, and I’ve been trying to read as many of the nominated works as I can before I cast my ballot. Because of a bloc-voting scheme orchestrated by the Sad Puppies and Rabid Puppies (and don’t get me started on the claims that they weren’t working together), some have argued that those of us opposed to the idea of bloc-voting should simply vote No Award above all the entries from Puppy slates. While I have some sympathy for the argument, I would feel guilty putting anything below No Award merely because it was recommended (and in some cases was written) by notorious bigots.

The awards are supposed to be about the artistic merits of the nominated pieces, right?

The WorldCon committee hosting each year’s awards traditionally assembles packets of either electronic copies of the nominated works, or excerpts (whichever the publisher will allow) to send to all voters. The Hugo Packets have not been sent out yet (but may show up any moment) so I’ve been locating the short stories that are available on-line to read (Much thanks to the Adventures in Reading blog for gathering all the links in one place; I wish I’d found this list much earlier). Other folks have been posting reviews as they read the stories.

So in this post, I write a short review of each of the short stories available on-line… Continue reading Hugo Ballot Reviews: Short Stories

Weekend Update: 5/16/2015

A few bits of news came in after I had scheduled yesterday’s Friday Links to post, but before they actually posted:

Legendary Blues guitarist B.B. King passed away Thursday night. He was 89 years old but just a few months ago still touring and charming audiences with his velvety voice. B.B. King: A Tribute to Blues Brotherhood.

Screen Shot 2015-05-16 at 10.03.01 AMWilliam Zinsser, writer, editor, and author (and frequent updater) of the legendary On Writing Well, died this week. He was 92 years old. William Zinsser, Author of ‘On Writing Well,’ Dies at 92. He is less famous for another book he wrote, in the early days of personal computing, when a lot of professional writers were up in arms about how word processors would destroy the craft of writing and make literature robotic (seriously), Zinsser wrote Writing With a Word Processor, extolling the virtues of the tool.

At least one of the virulent anti-gay bills the Texas legislature has been cooking up as fast as they can in anticipation of a summer Supreme Court ruling on marriage equality is dead for the moment: Same-sex marriage license ban bill dies in Texas legislature. On the other hand, 93 of the 98 Texas House Republicans Sign Shameful Anti-Gay Letter Pledging to Defy Supreme Court on Marriage.

And this pair of tweets went across my timeline yesterday afternoon. If you don’t know who Vox Day is, you’re lucky. Let’s just say he’s a virulent bigot who hates just about everyone:

Anyway, I thought it was a good thought to remember: holding people responsible for their hate speech is merely that, holding them responsible.

Friday Links (angry owl edition)

Screenshot from msnbc video.
Screenshot from msnbc video.
It’s Friday! The third Friday in May. My how the time files.

Anyway, here is a collection of some of the things that I ran across over the course of the week which struck me as worthy of being shared. Sorted into categories with headings so you can skip more easily:

Science!

Scientists Crack A 50-Year-Old Mystery About The Measles Vaccine.

Images: Uncovering the Colossal Dreadnoughtus Dinosaur.

Left-handed cosmic magnetic field could explain missing antimatter.

Writing and speaking come from different parts of the brain, study shows.

Early European may have had Neanderthal great-great-grandparent.

Our Galaxy Could be Mixing With Andromeda’s Supersized Halo.

5 Roman Inventions You Probably Take For Granted.

Weird political news:

Idiot Tennessee Rep Knows All The Christians Are Being Holocausted, Just Can’t Say Where.

Warning, Austin: Your Female City Councilors Will Talk a Lot, Hate Math.

Jon Stewart destroys Fox News scrooge Varney: ‘How f*cking removed from reality’ are you?

Texas Lawmakers Are Getting Ready To Defy The Supreme Court On Marriage.

Anti-Gay Activist Admits Her Testimony To Senators On Texas Anti-Gay Bill Was False.

Democrats demand probe into discrimination against Jews, gays on Middle Eastern airlines.

Evangelicals’ claims of conservative supremacy are overstated — and misread America’s religious landscape.

News for queers and our allies:

In Elementary School, I Was an Effeminate ‘Honey child’.

The Queer Cripple and the Body Conundrum.

Rush Limbaugh Tells Businesses To Blame Anti-Gay Bigotry On Muslims.

Dell Urges Texas Lawmakers To Stop Anti-Gay Marriage Bill.

NUMBER OF ANTI-LGBT HATE GROUPS INCREASES 10 PERCENT.

High School Wrestling Champ Quells Bi Rumors: “I’m Not Bisexual…I’m Gay.

Some LGBT residents critical of Utah’s new anti-discrimination law. When half the law is exemptions, it ought to be everyone who is unhappy… (except the bigots, of course)

LGBT’s: Don’t Forget Riots Are What Got Us Here.

Gay couples are facing pressure to get married from their employers.

Yes, There Are A Lot More Gay Christians Than You Probably Think.

Gay rights supporters score two victories in conservative Arkansas.

Why Tim Cook Should Threaten to Shut Down Apple Campus Amid Texas Anti-Gay Crusade.

The obligatory Sad Puppies/Hugo Awards update:

In which I waste time and annoy Puppies. “Obeying the rules doesn’t mean you played fair. It might just mean you’re a very successful weasel.”

Statistics of Gender on the Hugo Writing Nominees: Probabilities and Standard Deviations.

The Barker and the Big Tent.

Sad Puppies Review Books: IF YOU GIVE A MOUSE A COOKIE. Not all of these satirical reviews are funny, but I liked this one.

And other news:

OED appeals: can you help us find earlier evidence of the word jackalope?

Life Is “Triggering.” The Best Literature Should Be, Too.

Dr. Lepore’s Lament. Cheeky response to a New Yorker columnist’s clueless review of a feminist comic book.

Pleasure and self-care should not be luxuries.

Things I wrote:

Marooned off Vesta: more of why I love sf/f.

The stories we have to tell.

About disliking a ‘classic’ novel.

Happy News!

Angry owl signs fund new playground improvements.

California judge: Abstinence-only sex education isn’t sex education at all.

Videos!

Why the Daily Show had to change:

(If embedding doesn’t work, click here.)

The Carbonite Maneuver (1985):

(If embedding doesn’t work, click here.)

Scientists just captured stunning images of deep sea creatures off the coast of Puerto Rico:

(If embedding doesn’t work, click here.)

Bertha, Mayor Murray and the Viaduct Doom Portal:

(If embedding doesn’t work, click here.)

ABC The Muppets First Look:

(If embedding doesn’t work, click here.)

Faith No More – Superhero:

(If embedding doesn’t work, click here.)

The Avener, Phoebe Killdeer – Fade Out Lines:

(If embedding doesn’t work, click here.)

Marooned off Vesta: more of why I love sf/f

125aMy dad’s idea of a vacation was to go camping and catch fish. Unfortunately, these trips not only never involved a camper, they also never included tents. We slept in sleeping bags under the stars gathered around the dying embers of the fire we’d cooked dinner on. If it was raining, the whole family would crowd inside the cab of Dad’s pickup and try to sleep sitting up all squeezed together.

I wasn’t terribly good at any “outdoorsman” sorts of skills, and Dad never missed an opportunity to tell me just what a clumsy, stupid, sissy I was whenever I did anything incorrectly. Though, for the record, he never called me anything as nice as “sissy.”

So I didn’t much enjoy those vacations.

The last one we took, before my parents’ marriage took its final turn for the worse, was when I was 13 or 14 years old. Shortly before we had left on the trip, I had acquired a paperback copy of The Early Asimov, Volume 1, and had packed it along. I’m not sure why that particular book had jumped out at me in the small bookstore that we had visited with my Great-grandma on a weekend trip to a nearby town that was large enough to have an actual bookstore. My best guess is that, since Asimov was at that time the author of a monthly science essay that appeared in each issue of The Magazine of Fantasy & Science Fiction that I had recognized his name.

I remember waking up early in the morning several times on that camping trip, my parents and sister still asleep, and going to the pickup to retrieve the paperback book from my bag. Then I sat and read until Dad woke up. Just looking at the cover of my worn old copy of the book brings back memories of the early morning light, the sounds of wind in the leaves overhead, and the nearby creek.

The Early Asimov was first released as a hardcover, single volume book a couple of years before I found the paperback. It is a collection of a bunch of Isaac Asimov’s short stories from the first nine or ten years of his career; specifically stories that had not already been included in any other anthologies. But the book isn’t merely an anthology—in between each story, Asimov wrote about how he came to write the story, along with describing other stories he wrote at the time that either had never been published, or had been and were in other collections. These interludes were much more than mere introductions to the story, they amounted to an autobiography. And the story this autobiography told was how a Russian-Jewish kid from Brooklyn discovered science fiction in the magazine rack of his family’s candy store, and became a published professional sci if writer before he exited his teens.

Isaac’s personal story gave me at least as much hope and wonder about the possibilities of the future as his science fiction did. The stories themselves were entertaining and thought-provoking. Asimov clearly loved science, and he was perpetually optimistic that great things could be accomplished with the proper application of knowledge.

And he wrote good stories.

Not just a few stories. He published over 300 books. He wrote science fiction novels, of course, and collected his short stories into anthologies, but he also wrote science fact books, history books, books on literature, and so much more. I mentioned his monthly science column—he wrote 399 of those from 1958 until his death in 1992. About every year and a half he collected the last 15 to 17 of them into a book, wrote additional introductory information, and published them (Janet Todd Rubin gives a great explanation of the importance of Isaac’s science columns here: (Almost) Everything I learned about science I learned from Isaac Asimov). And then there were the many limerick collections…

But back to the sci fi:

His Foundation series, besides being the first collection of novels to be awarded a Hugo as a collection, established the concept of psychohistory: a science of applying mathematical formulas to the actions of large populations to predict various outcomes. His Robot stories were the first to posit artificial intelligences that did not turn on their masters, and he was the first person to coin the word “robotics” which has become the name of the real engineering discipline he described in the books.

And then there were his mysteries. Science fiction mysteries at first (including the Wendell Urth science fictional science mysteries), but also a series of mystery short stories set in contemporary setting (Tales of the Black Widowers, and sequels), and two straight murder novels. Though my favorite of those, Murder at the ABA which was set at a booksellers convention, isn’t entirely serious. One of the supporting characters in that one is Asimov himself, and he portrayed himself very self-deprecatingly, making his character the comic relief of an otherwise serious murder investigation.

I didn’t really know all of that at the time, but reading that book over the course of several mornings on that vacation, Isaac Asimov gave me hope that I could write science fiction and get it published, too. Hope not only that I could write and get published, but that there were people out there interested in the things I was interested in. I didn’t have to remain trapped, like the protagonists of “Marooned off Vesta” stuck with no propulsion, no radio, a limited amount of air, and a year’s supply of water. I could rig up a propulsion system from the things I had, and get to a safer place.

His writing style was described as unadorned. Some people complained that he very seldom described his characters or the settings. I think that was a strength. His stories focused on the plot. His characters were defined by their words and deeds. He described only those things that needed to be described to understand the story, leaving the rest to the reader’s imagination. Allowing the reader to imagine characters who weren’t always white, for instance.

He raised questions, and answered them with a mix of science and humor that made the future seem like a very inviting place. And his willingness in many anthologies and essays to share anecdotes of his encounters with other writers (not to mention the many stories of the times he was Toastmaster at a Hugo Award ceremony) made the world of science fiction writers and fandom seem an even more welcoming place.

He was quick to laugh, and quicker to make others laugh. Sometimes too quick. He had to have thyroid surgery at one point in his life, and when they gave him the tranquilizer before they move the patient into the operating room, he began singing and joking with everyone. When the surgeon came into the operating room, Isaac sat up, grabbed the doctor’s scrubs in both hands, and blurted out, “Doctor! Doctor! In green coat! Doctor, won’t you cut my throat? And when you’re finished, Doctor, then, Won’t you sew it up again?”

The nurses got him back down and the anesthesiologist put him under. The nurses later told Isaac’s wife that the doctor couldn’t stop laughing for nearly five minutes. When he included this story in one of his essays, he noted, “They say I’ll do anything for a laugh, but I think that making a surgeon about to take a scalpel to me laugh so hard he can’t hold an instrument may have been a step too far.”

I could easily ramble on and on about Asimov, the awards he won, the records he set, the serious science circles he moved in, and the many, many bookshelves in our house filled with his books. He loved knowledge and he loved explaining things (two traits that I know more than a little about), and he wrote in a way that encouraged you to think, to be curious, and to meet challenges with confidence and a smile.

The stories we have to tell

"Don't forget, no one else sees the world they way you do, so no one else can tell the stories that you have to tell." - Charles de Lint“Researcher Dale Spender in Australia used audio and video tape to independently evaluate who talked the most in mixed-gender university classroom discussions. Regardless of the gender ratio of the students, whether the instructor was deliberately trying to encourage female participation or not, men always talked more—whether the metric was minutes of talking or number of words spoken.

“Moreover, men literally have no clue how much they talk. When Spencer asked students to evaluate their perception of who talked more in a given discussion, women were pretty accurate; but men perceived the discussion as being “equal” when women talked only 15% of the time, and the discussion as being dominated by women if they talked only 30% of the time.”

My conclusion: men think women talk too much because they think women should be silent.

This perception problem isn’t limited to gender issues. Any person in a position of power or privilege thinks that any time someone outside their group talks or is recognized more than a tiny fraction of the time that the others are dominating the situation.

  • It is part of the reason that someone like Senator Cotton of Arizona can go on a national news program and say, with a straight face, that lesbians and gay men should stop demanding full equality and simply be grateful that we aren’t being publicly executed by the government.
  • It’s part of the reason the GamerGate goons start screaming that women are taking away their fun simply by suggesting that maybe a few games might be made that don’t treat woman as objects to be destroyed and avenged or taken as a prize.
  • It’s the reason that rightwing politicians and the like can claim that Christians are being oppressed despite the fact that: Christian holy days are observed as both state and federal holidays; two-thirds of the justices on the Supreme Court are Catholic; the President, Vice-President, Speaker of the House, Senate Majority Leader, Senate Minority Leader, House Minority Leader (heck, 92 percent of the members of Congress) are Christian; where many states have laws that explicitly exempt Christians from anti-bullying laws and policies at schools (in other words, Christians can bully anyone they want, as long as they claim it is due to their sincerely held belief); and where not one single state has enacted laws banning Christians from getting married, or adopting children, or being teachers.
  • And yes, it’s part of the reason that someone like Larry Correia and his cohorts—Brad Torgerson, Theodore Beale (aka Vox Day), and John C. Wright—can see more than one or two women or people of color nominated in a single category for the Hugo Awards and start screaming that science fiction is being taken away from people like them.

A bit over a year ago, Laurie Penny wrote Whose wankfest is this anyway? The BBC’s Sherlock doesn’t just engage with fan fiction – it is fan fiction for The New Statesmen which included this brilliant observation:

“What is significant about fan fiction is that it often spins the kind of stories that showrunners wouldn’t think to tell, because fanficcers often come from a different demographic. The discomfort seems to be not that the shows are being reinterpreted by fans, but that they are being reinterpreted by the wrong sorts of fans – women, people of colour, queer kids, horny teenagers, people who are not professional writers, people who actually care about continuity (sorry). The proper way for cultural mythmaking to progress, it is implied, is for privileged men to recreate the works of privileged men from previous generations whilst everyone else listens quietly.”

Laurie Penny is talking about the BBC series, Sherlock, and quite rightly pointing out that the series itself is fan fiction. It is being produced and broadcast on a prestigious network, and very few people would say that it isn’t real story telling, but the series is a re-imagining of stories written more than a hundred years ago by Arthur Conan Doyle. It isn’t sneered upon the same way that Buffy fanfic or ElfQuest fanfic or Teen Wolf fanfic or Supernatural fanfic is in part because the source material for Sherlock is in the public domain, but also in no small part because the people writing it are a pair of middle-aged University-educated white male British citizens.

Her insight doesn’t apply only to fan fiction.

Stories—whether they be fiction or the narrative of our existence or history—shouldn’t come from only privileged voices. They need to come from all voices, including women, people of color, queers, young people, old people, prudes, libertines, people who aren’t (yet) professional, and most definitely people who actually care about continuity. That’s why those of us who aren’t part of the dominant demographic need to tell our stories. And we need to make room for others to tell theirs.

About disliking a ‘classic’ novel

When we don’t like something that a friend likes a great deal, they may be surprised—even shocked. I know I’m often surprised when I share a book or movie or series that I think is the coolest thing I’ve experienced in years with a friend and they can’t stand it. How can they not see how amazing it is? I ask. And sometimes I ask far too emphatically and make them feel defensive.

It’s one thing when a single friend is disappointed that we don’t like something they’ve shared with us. It’s quite another when it seems the entire world thinks some book is one of the greatest novels ever written, but you think it’s mediocre at best. You wind up feeling more than just defensive. Especially when the people going on about how good it is are writers whose work you love, or teachers that you admire. You wonder if something is wrong with you. Did you miss something when you read it? Are you not quite discerning enough to recognize its nuances? Are you simply not smart enough to understand it?

Sure, we all understand that people have differing tastes. But when a specific book evokes labels like “great” and “a classic” from the sorts of people who should be good at spotting greatness, we expect to at least be able to recognize why the other people liked it more than we did. Part of the problem is, of course, that significant doesn’t always also mean engaging.

For instance, I was in middle school and high school in the 1970s, when The Catcher in the Rye was one of the most-banned books in the U.S. I read and listened to a lot of arguments about why it should or shouldn’t be banned, including descriptions of the subject matter of the novel, with debates about what it meant. When it first came to my attention, I remember trying to find a copy in both the school’s library and my local library, and coming up empty handed. The book had been described so vehemently as immoral by a teacher who happened to be the husband of one of the librarians at the public library, I decided not to put in an inter-library loan request. I didn’t want to deal with awkward questions. Being anti-censorship from a young age, this left me with the feeling that someday, when I was no longer trapped in the boonies, I would read the book for myself.

I didn’t actually get around to reading it until my mid-twenties. I was a bit underwhelmed. It isn’t a badly written book, by any means, but I’d been led to expect something mind-blowingly good and life-changing. I found it fell far short in both respects. Maybe the subject matter and style, which had been innovative and edgy when it was published in 1951 was simply too quaint by the mid-80s. Or maybe I had read too many books and stories and seen too many movies and plays that had been influenced by it.

The “Tales of Passing Time” blog posted a great description of the phenomenon:

A classic novel isn’t good because it’s a classic, rather it is a classic because it was important to the development of the art. And that certainly doesn’t mean that any given person, on any given day, will enjoy reading it. It means that, as a writer, I should be aware of what the classic novel changed in the historical progression of novel story telling. Some classics are pretty terrible, even unreadable, but they are still important.

I would rephrase that just slightly: sometimes a classic novel isn’t called a classic because it was good, but rather because it had a significant influence on the development of the art.

Sometimes a novel was the first one to introduce a particular idea, and that idea was mind-blowing and life-changing. It was so life-changing, that hundreds of novels since have taken the idea and developed it in different ways; each author putting their own spin on it. The idea becomes part of the fabric of literature after that, so that a reader born decades later will have encountered that once mind-blowing notion hundreds or even thousands of times. By which point, if we read the original, which might have contained no redeeming qualities other than this one idea, it feels derivative of all this other stuff we’ve experienced. We may intellectually know that the “classic” inspired all the other instances or variants of the idea we encountered. Emotionally, however, it strikes us the other way around, because we have already internalized the once mind-blowing idea.

The fact that the idea has become ubiquitous is a testament to the significance of the classic in question to literature and the culture in general. It doesn’t mean that everyone is going to love it’s original package.

Assessments, plans, and implementations: a metapost

Click to embiggen.

Some parts of this post may fall too far into the “what I had for breakfast” zone for some of you, but it helps me to stick to plans if I share them with people. Not that I get nagged often by my readers, I just am more motivated to do things I have said I would do than to follow through on plans that I keep to myself.

So I’ve been making some changes to my routines in an attempt to improve my writing productivity, and I’m thinking about some changes for this blog…
Continue reading Assessments, plans, and implementations: a metapost

Friday Links (insane lawsuit edition!)

32613-equal-protection-20130326202918It’s Friday! Another not very pleasant week of work is very nearly over! Last weekend I had a fabulous date night with my very sexy husband, then we had a fun movie excursion with 8 of the coolest nerds in the Puget Sound, and then we had a great time journeying to the year 1877 and meddling with the Russo-Turkish War (though by this session of the game it was all down to treaty negotions and shopping trips). This weekend we’re gaming with other friends in a land of candy-colored ponies and cosmic forces no pony was meant to understand. Some months, the weekends are the only thing that make life bearable, no?

Anyway, here is a collection of some of the things that I ran across over the course of the week which struck me as worthy of being shared. I’ve decided to do the links a little differently this time, and make it easier for people to skip the sorts of things they aren’t interested in. But first up, the silliest story of the week, perhaps of the entire year:

This Woman Is Suing All Gay People On Earth On God’s Behalf. Yes, Really. I’m linking to several versions of the story, mostly because I love the headlines. You really don’t need to click on more than one of them…

God Sues Homosexuals In Nebraska. God Has Terrible Grammar.

Woman Sues Homosexuals in Federal Court—All Homosexuals.

Nebraska Woman Sues All Homosexuals. I love that this site posted all seven pages of the woman’s poorly spelled handwritten brief.

Ambitiously Homophobic Nebraska Woman Sues Every Gay on Earth.

Totally Normal Nebraska Lady Would Like To See ALL GAYS In Court Right Now!

But the fun couldn’t last through the week: Judge Tosses Lawsuit By Nebraska Woman Suing ‘All Homosexuals’ On Behalf Of Jesus.

That’s more than enough about that. Meanwhile, some cool things happened in science:

UW tracks undersea volcano erupting off Washington coast.

Honey Bunches of Lies: Why eating local honey won’t cure your allergies.

Ladybirds are widely adored for their spotty bodies, but these cute beetles often eat each other and are infested with blood-sucking mites.

Meet Loki, your closest-known prokaryote relative.

The ‘other’ red meat on the ‘real’ palaeodiet.

The Rök Stone – Riddles and answers.

10 Real-Life Animal Husbandry Techniques That Alien Zoos Will Use On Us.

CRAZY CAMOUFLAGE: LET’S PLAY SPOT THE SNOW LEOPARD.

That was fun! Now the weird political news:

A Couple Quick Thoughts on Geller in Texas.

Republicans Admit Hobby Lobby Ruling Is Religious Tyranny Meant to Control Women.

“We need to talk about this as terrorism”: The war against abortion providers.

Wonder Why The American Right Is So Dumb? Read Fox Nation vs. Reality: The Fox News Cult Of Ignorance.

Ben Carson Enters GOP Race with “A Glory Hallelujah Star-Spangled Jesus Frenzy”.

Death for Drug Dealers and Quarantines for AIDS Victims: The Mike Huckabee You May Not Remember.

Jon Stewart Mocks ‘Lone Star Lunatics’ Who Believe Obama Is Trying To Invade Texas (Video).

The ludicrous myth of Republican fiscal responsibility: A history lesson for the modern GOP.

Americans Far More Comfortable With Gay Presidential Candidate Than Evangelical Christian.

Carly Fiorina Is Running to Be 2016’s Sarah Palin.

Now the news relevant to queer people, and those who love us

How to count how many people are gay. Another take on the very tricky statistical question.

WHAT MARRIAGE EQUALITY WOULD MEAN FOR THE ECONOMY.

Mom, Dad, I’m Not a Lesbian.

How big business in Texas is rallying to defend gay rights.

Why the Boycott Against Ted Cruz’s Gay Hosts Is a Watershed Moment.

Oregon bill to ban conversion therapy for LGBT youth sent to governor’s desk.

ANTI-LGBT ACTIVIST WHO ONCE TRIED TO BURN KORAN SUES FORT WORTH OVER TREATMENT AT GAY PRIDE: VIDEO.

CECIL BALDWIN, DYLAN MARRON, AND KEVIN WADA SLATED TO JOIN NYC’S FIRST LGBTQ-CENTIC COMIC CONVENTION ‘FLAME CON’.

This Gay Couple Shows How Love Can Overcome Bigotry.

And I wrote about, among other things, how I became a fan of the sci fi tales of John Varley: Picnic on the Queer Side: more of why I love sf/f.

People we lost:

Errol Brown, ‘You Sexy Thing’ vocalist, dead at 71.

Grace Lee Whitney, Yeoman Rand on ‘Star Trek,’ dead at 85.

Jayne Meadows Dies at 95; Widow of Steve Allen Was Nominated for 3 Emmys.

The obligatory Sad Puppies/Hugo Awards update:

How conservatives took over sci-fi’s most prestigious award.

An open letter to Chief Warrant Officer Brad R. Torgersen.

Change, Reaction and Pain – Coping With Cultural Backlash.

I wrote about why I love science fiction and why this situation bothers me: Visions and Ventures: why I love sf/f.

And a follow up about why I said what I meant and meant what I said and will not be lectured by people who don’t know the situation as well as I do: Adventures in being straightsplained.

And other news:

Preschool rallies after little free library is torched. What kind of scumbag sets fire to a little free library? WARNING: video plays automatically.

3 Things No Estranged Child Needs To Hear On Mother’s Day.

Video shows four parole officers detained by gun-wielding police for Driving While Black.

The Price of Nice Nails.

Today Is the 151st Birthday of All-Around Feminist Badass Nellie Bly.

Hostage saves herself via Pizza Hut app: “Please help. Get 911 to me.”

Abstinence-Only Texas High School Hit By Chlamydia Outbreak; 1 In 15 Students Affected.

Why Are the Star Wars Prequels Hated So Much? Besides the fact that they mostly sucked, you mean?

U.S. top court rejects challenge to New Jersey ‘gay conversion therapy’ ban.

Videos!

MIKA – Talk About You:

(If embedding doesn’t work, click here.)

Hot Chocolate – You sexy thing 1975:

(If embedding doesn’t work, click here.)

Beauty And The Beat Boots by Todrick Hall:

(If embedding doesn’t work, click here.)

Brandon Flowers – I Can Change (Audio):

(If embedding doesn’t work, click here.)

Magic Mike XXL – Official Trailer [HD]:

(If embedding doesn’t work, click here.)

“Vacation” Red Band Trailer – I’m not really interested in a sequel/reboot (the head of the family is supposed to be a grown up Rusty Griswald) but then I heard about the R-rated final bit in the trailer with Chris Hemsworth and decided I could at least watch the trailer:

(If embedding doesn’t work, click here.)

Bright Light Bright Light & Ana Matronic – Good Luck (Remix) – Official Video:

(If embedding doesn’t work, click here.)

The Last Word with Lawrence O’Donnell 5/6/15 Dodgers fans cheer for gay couple on Kiss Cam:

(If embedding doesn’t work, click here.)